My first beam assembler hack
Peter Lund
erlang@REDACTED
Mon Dec 5 10:31:25 CET 2005
Found this in the online docs about the compiler:file/2 options...
||
||
|asm|
The input file is expected to be assembler code (default file suffix
".S"). Note that the format of assembler files is not documented,
and may change between releases - this option is primarily for
internal debugging use.
I was not able to find the 'form_asm' option, but maybe I was looking in
the wrong place or something.
/Peter
Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB) wrote:
>Interesting.
>
>Beam assembler certainly is the language of choice
>for the discriminating hacker. (:
>
>I guess this might be a nice alternative to my
>plain_fsm hack (which relies on parse transforms).
>
>Now, how stable/documented is the .S format?
>
>/Uffe
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tony Rogvall [mailto:tony@REDACTED]
>>Sent: den 4 december 2005 23:55
>>To: Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB)
>>Cc: Erlang Users' List
>>Subject: My first beam assembler hack
>>
>>
>>Just want to share some beam assembler hack with you ;-)
>>
>>Attach a assembler module called message.S
>>
>>compile it with:
>>
>> erlc +form_asm message.S
>>
>>Then I wrote a module mbox.erl that can use some of the
>>features in message.S
>>
>>Have fun
>>
>>/Tony
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list