[Off-topic: licensing] Re: OpenPoker: Business question
David Hopwood
david.nospam.hopwood@REDACTED
Fri Aug 26 19:33:20 CEST 2005
Joel Reymont wrote:
> Judging from my experience with the previous version of OpenPoker I
> would not make any money if I release the software under the GPL. Is
> there another open source license that you would recommend that would
> let me restrict the source code to non-commercial use only?
A non-commercial license is by definition not open source (or free
software):
<http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php> section 6,
"may not restrict the program from being used in a business"
<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html>, "A free program
must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and
commercial distribution."
This means that the issue of license compatibility does not arise
(your non-commercial license will be incompatible no matter what),
and so you can choose pretty much any non-commercial license designed
for software.
--
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@REDACTED>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list