beam.shared and beam.hybrid

Bjorn Gustavsson bjorn@REDACTED
Wed Apr 27 11:34:31 CEST 2005

We (both OTP and the HiPE group) see much more potential in
the Hybrid heap than in the Shared heap.

Therefore we (OTP) test the Hybrid heap in our daily builds,
but not the Shared heap.

The Hybrid heap is not as stable as the private heap (default) emulator
yet, but it is slowly growing more and more stable.


Mickael Remond <mickael.remond@REDACTED> writes:

> Hello,
> I just noticed that beam.shared is no more build by default. On system
> that can support it, beam.hybrid is build however (R10B-3)
> Does this means that beam.hybrid now "officially" replaced the
> beam.shared emulator and that we should refer beam.hybrid ? Can it be
> a direct replacement for case where beam.shared were used ?
> I thought the hybrid model was still experimental however, so if you
> have any information on its status, this is welcome.
> Thank you in advance.
> -- 
> Mickaël Rémond

Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list