Big state machines

Ulf Wiger ulf@REDACTED
Mon Apr 18 22:45:17 CEST 2005

Den 2005-04-18 22:03:59 skrev Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB) <ulf.wiger@REDACTED>:

> I have another version, as a matter of fact, which is much
> closer to gen_fsm. It solves the dreaded complexity explosion
> problem, but the programmer may still have to resort to e.g.
> continuations to handle out-of-order messages (since it uses
> FIFO semantics.)

Bah! Forget that nonsense. The continuations are not needed
due to FIFO semantics, but due to the non-blocking "go-to-like"


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list