copy elimination for tuples
Vlad Balin
vlad@REDACTED
Thu Mar 18 17:24:08 CET 2004
Thanks for reply. Are there any documents available describing GC techniques
used in HiPE and BEAM?
Vlad.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Carlsson [mailto:richardc@REDACTED]
> Sent: 17 марта 2004 г. 22:06
> To: Vlad Balin
> Cc: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: Re: copy elimination for tuples
>
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Vlad Balin wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in copy elimination optimization for tuples.
> As far as
> > I know, this feature has not been implemented yet. Is there any
> > specific reason or considerations? Have anyone tried to do that?
>
> The main obstacle is that the garbage collector currently
> requires that there are no pointers from an older generation
> to a younger one. This means that you can only "zap" fields
> in a tuple if you have full control of where the tuple is
> located. For instance, a tuple that was created only a few
> steps earlier (even in the same function) may have already
> been moved to an older generation if a GC was triggered
> between the two program points. So it is not enough to know
> that the tuple will not be needed in its old form when you do
> a "setelement".
>
> Currently, some destructive updating of tuple fields is
> introduced when it is certain that there will be no GC; this
> typically happens in the code generated to create tuples when
> the "record syntax" is expanded. Note that this is a compiler
> optimization only - the destructive setelement operations
> cannot be accessed from normal Erlang code.
>
> /Richard
>
>
> Richard Carlsson (richardc@REDACTED) (This space
> intentionally left blank.)
> E-mail: Richard.Carlsson@REDACTED WWW:
> http://user.it.uu.se/~richardc/
> "Having users is like
> optimization: the wise course is to delay it."
> -- Paul Graham
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list