Garbage collection of binaries
Joachim Durchholz
joachim.durchholz@REDACTED
Fri Oct 17 11:14:58 CEST 2003
Sean Hinde wrote:
> Is there not some mechanism which could be introduced to specifically
> check for processes growing in this way - I don't know, perhaps every
> time a very large binary is assigned on the heap check to see if it
> might be a good time do do a "survival" GC? Maybe a running total could
> be kept of binaries assigned over a certain size?
Yuck - that's all things that GC is already supposed to do.
One thing that I have seen happen is that GC didn't take the binaries
into account when deciding whether it should collect or not. In other
words, the decision was made based on heap use, not based on total
memory footprint. In that case, it's quite easy to fill up the entire
swap space without the GC ever kicking in.
Personally, I think that binaries should not be reference counted, they
should be managed by an Erlang object that keeps the information on the
true size of the binary. YMMV :-)
Regards,
Jo
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list