SSL in Erlang/OTP

[Tony Rogvall]

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 21:10, Peter H|gfeldt wrote:
> Yes, I agree that ssl:recv/x and ssl:send/x should behave as
> gen_tcp:recv/x and gen_tcp:send/x do. 
> 
> I will add that request to the todo-list for the next release.
> 
Did not Bluetail send the ssl driver to OTP? The Bluetail ssl driver was
a clone of gen_tcp. It did support reading sessions (even reading
encoded sessions that could be sent to other nodes or stored in mnesia
for distrubuted SSL sessions :-)

My idea is to integrate ssl in gen_tcp to make life alot easier. Think
of STARTTLS/HTTP Upgrade .... 

It is also "easy" to snoop SSLv3/SessionID's, then push back the
client-hello with gen_tcp:unrecv, then ssl:accept (VOILA)

Bluetail folks, did you send the ssl_drv ????

/Tony

-- 
Tony Rogvall <tony@REDACTED>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20031128/2a81ae31/attachment.bin>