Sendfile in erlang

Luke Gorrie luke@REDACTED
Fri Nov 14 17:14:00 CET 2003

Ulf Wiger <ulf.wiger@REDACTED> writes:

> My wet dream is that one should always start by developing a reference
> implementation of any given protocol in Erlang. Then -- only if performance
> is not good enough -- implement (or buy) one in C. The Erlang-based
> implementation will help you understand the protocol fully, can serve
> as an education and testing tool, and should eventually (this should be
> a goal for the development of Erlang) be the preferred implementation
> to use in your commercial product.

Did this just the other month when building a "distributed ethernet
switch" out of Linux boxes. There's already a switch in Linux
('bridge' module), we just needed the "distributed" part. No worries -
wrote a virtual network device in Erlang with the 'tuntap' application
from Jungerl. To Linux it looks like a network card, but frames
sent/received just go to Erlang - which tunnels them over UDP between
other nodes.

Ultimately we did want more performance - the bottleneck seemed to be
the user/kernel interface. But by then it was all very well
understood, and took one day to port the traffic code into a kernel

Amazing every now and then when things go as they should. :-)

Dream-wise though, I would prefer to use shared-memory between user
and kernel space for packet buffers to avoid the copies and keep the
logic in userspace. Linux seems to already have features in this


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list