^G/^C in shell on Windows
Vlad Dumitrescu
vlad_dumitrescu@REDACTED
Wed Jun 18 15:19:46 CEST 2003
Okay, thanks for the info.
I'm testing an app that is most easily restarted by killing the runtime and
restarting it, and werl is not so handy from a command prompt. I solved it
by letting my app call init:stop() when it ends :-)
regards,
Vlad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raimo Niskanen" <raimo.niskanen@REDACTED>
> Well, it is kind of a known thing...
>
> The command "erl" on windows corresponds to "erl -oldshell" on Unix, and
> the "-oldshell" option causes ^G to do just what you describes. Note
> also that almost no command line editing works. This shell can (on Unix)
> be used against non-terminals e.g pipes.
>
> ^C on Unix brings up the break handler menu as you describes, but
> rumours here say that we could not get the break handler menu to work on
> Windows so it was disabled. Therefore you exit the emulator, but you
> should not have gotten a break handler menu. That is probably a bug.
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB.
>
>
>
> Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that ^G doesn't work for me: what it seems to do is just start
> > another shell (or restart the other one), because I get the "Eshell
> > V5.2.3.3" banner and the prompt is reset to 1.
> >
> > Pressing ^C on the other hand, prints the "BREAK: (a)bort....." message
but
> > doesn't wait for any input, it just ends execution. Sometimes not even
the
> > message gets printed but the program crashes (there comes a "The memory
> > could not be read" error), but I think this latter has to do with port
> > programs running.
> >
> > This is in erl.exe, not werl.exe. Werl works fine.
> >
> > Should I gather some more data and submit it for analysis, or is it a
known
> > thing?
> >
> > regards,
> > Vlad
>
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list