The Erlang way - dynamic upgrade of a server and UBF extensions

Vance Shipley vances@REDACTED
Wed Apr 30 17:19:20 CEST 2003


I think you have missed the point in that it is NAT which is ugly.


On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:02:35PM +0200, Miguel Barreiro Paz wrote:
}  > About the idea of embedding IP addresses in the IP packet data: please
}  > don't do it! If your packet passes through a NAT/PAT firewall/router
}  > you're embedded addresses become meaningless. I don't know what to
}  Indeed. Please don't repeat that ugly side of FTP, RTSP or the H.323
}  protocol family.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list