The Erlang way - dynamic upgrade of a server and UBF extensions
Wed Apr 30 17:19:20 CEST 2003
I think you have missed the point in that it is NAT which is ugly.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:02:35PM +0200, Miguel Barreiro Paz wrote:
} > About the idea of embedding IP addresses in the IP packet data: please
} > don't do it! If your packet passes through a NAT/PAT firewall/router
} > you're embedded addresses become meaningless. I don't know what to
} Indeed. Please don't repeat that ugly side of FTP, RTSP or the H.323
} protocol family.
More information about the erlang-questions