Complexity Shock Horror II: the Sequel (was Re: MD5 in erlang
Tue Apr 8 09:11:04 CEST 2003
I will fix it for R9C.
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP
Robert Virding wrote:
> This is a bug in the scanner, probably due to reusing functions in the wrong
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <bernardp@REDACTED>
> To: <erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Complexity Shock Horror II: the Sequel (was Re: MD5 in erlang
>>From: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <bernardp@REDACTED>
>>>BTW, I find this behaviour of the erlang parser puzzling:
>>>Is this intended? what's its rationale?
>>I mean, I know the correct syntax, I am wondering why
>>this doesn't raise an error.
>>I was cheking if by chance I had overlooked a bit of syntax
>>and 16#-123 was valid.
More information about the erlang-questions