Complexity Shock Horror II: the Sequel (was Re: MD5 in erlang

[Raimo Niskanen]

I will fix it for R9C.

/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP



Robert Virding wrote:
> This is a bug in the scanner, probably due to reusing functions in the wrong
> context.
> 
> Robert
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <bernardp@REDACTED>
> To: <erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Complexity Shock Horror II: the Sequel (was Re: MD5 in erlang
> 
> 
> 
>>From: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <bernardp@REDACTED>
>>
>>>BTW, I find this behaviour of the erlang parser puzzling:
>>>
>>>51> 16#-123.
>>>-123
>>>52> 16#.
>>>0
>>>
>>>Is this intended?  what's its rationale?
>>
>>I mean, I know the correct syntax, I am wondering why
>>this doesn't raise an error.
>>
>>I was cheking if by chance I had overlooked a bit of syntax
>>and 16#-123 was valid.
>>
>>P.
>>
>>
> 
>