Higher Order Function Question

[Fredrik Linder]

> but there is no notation "fun M:F/A" for functions in other modules,
> because of the way inter-module ("remote") calls work with dynamic code
> replacement in Erlang.

You're right. At least I forgot that the M: part isn't supported. :-)

But wouldn't it be nice to have that syntax though. (Could be syntactical
suger for {M, F}) but I guess that would remove the /A check, if there is
one)

/Fredrik