Shock horror

[Miguel Barreiro Paz]

> If I may add my humble opinion, this is why having a "-uses([module])." or 
> similar would help - by making the relations between modules explicit. This 
> might even encompass applys with variable arguments - only calls to listed 
> modules will be allowed.
	
	What about "fun(M,F) -> M:F(myargs)"-style code then? ok, one can
think of not providing a "-uses()" header as "heck, who knows what it
uses, allow everything", but it's a bit like the current
-compile(export_all): a hack frowned upon.

Regards,

Miguel