File system software???
Gerd Flaig
gerd@REDACTED
Thu Jul 4 11:25:52 CEST 2002
Joe Armstrong <joe@REDACTED> writes:
> In Windows/linux applications are made of multitudes of files - now
> there mighthave to be lots of small files in an application but there
> is no good reason why the user should known this - all files
> (including any new files created by the application should be neatly
> hidden away *inside* a container - also you should not be able to see
> inside the container.
the container does exist already. It's called a directory. I don't see
why you would want to make it complicated to look inside the container
- users will always find ways to break stuff.
The only part that is missing would be the ability to execute
directories. This could easily be accomplished in most modern shells
by a few lines of configuration.
$ tar xvzf app.tar.gz
app/
app/run
app/data/
app/data/a
app/data/b
app/data/c
$ ./app
[ translated to ./app/run ]
[ app running happily forever after ]
Obviously, the application should not be dependent on the location of
the directory in the filesystem.
You could still use all standard utilities to manipulate stuff which
is a major win.
Goodbyte, Gerd.
--
Gerd Flaig Technik gerd@REDACTED
Bei Schlund + Partner AG Erbprinzenstr. 4-12 D-76133 Karlsruhe
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results,
but that's not why we do it. -- Richard Feynman
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list