Monitoring of nodes..
Wed May 17 08:45:59 CEST 2000
Geoff Wong <geoff@REDACTED> wrote:
> Indeed net_kernel:monitor_nodes(true) also gives unexpected behaviour.
> If we do:
> net_adm:ping(my@REDACTED), % assuming this is up and responds with 'ping'
> receive X -> X end.
> Then terminate my@REDACTED and we never get a nodedown message
> on the node which ran net_kernel:monitor_nodes().
Note that you'll receive a nodeup message as well when you ping the
(a@REDACTED)3> receive X -> X end.
(a@REDACTED)4> receive Y -> Y end.
If the node was already connected before thr ping, you wouldn't have
received the nodeup though. (however, you do receive the nodedown).
More information about the erlang-questions