From bfulg@REDACTED Tue Feb 1 09:10:26 2005 From: bfulg@REDACTED (Brent Fulgham) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:10:26 -0800 Subject: Documentation Search Path Patches Message-ID: <88c369de4370c7eef846f287a9cbdab3@pacbell.net> These patches have been reported a few times (and applied in the Debian and DarwinPorts packages of Erlang.) Could they please be applied to upstream OTP so that package maintainers do not have to keep applying the same patches? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: brent.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 10364 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Thanks, -Brent -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From sean.hinde@REDACTED Tue Feb 1 17:57:05 2005 From: sean.hinde@REDACTED (Sean Hinde) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:57:05 +0000 Subject: Documentation Search Path Patches In-Reply-To: <88c369de4370c7eef846f287a9cbdab3@pacbell.net> References: <88c369de4370c7eef846f287a9cbdab3@pacbell.net> Message-ID: <4D6470C0-7472-11D9-9DE5-000A95927CCE@mac.com> Hi, I also just spent some time playing with Darwinports for R10B-2, and concluded that most of these patches are no longer needed - the doc path does not have html in the middle of it. The only part I needed was the one for using "open" instead of "netscape". If I can figure out how to submit a patch to darwinports I will. Regards, Sean On 1 Feb 2005, at 08:10, Brent Fulgham wrote: > These patches have been reported a few times (and applied in the > Debian and DarwinPorts packages of Erlang.) Could they please be > applied to upstream OTP so that package maintainers do not have to > keep applying the same patches? > > > > Thanks, > > -Brent From erlang@REDACTED Tue Feb 1 21:16:02 2005 From: erlang@REDACTED (Peter L) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:16:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Documentation Search Path Patches Message-ID: <61317.82.182.146.59.1107288962.squirrel@www69.webcows.se> For FreeBSD 5.3 I found an erlang port to R10B-2. In the Makefile I found out the email adress of the "MAINTAINER" (Jimmy Olgeni). I emailed him to get your run_erl.c patch included into the port for FreeBSD 5.3. When I last night installed 5.3 on my server at home it worked perfectly alright (except for run_erl). With the port I am now also able to attach with to_erl (after the run_erl fix) which I could not do without the port... /Peter > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Fran: owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED > [mailto:owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED]For Sean Hinde > Skickat: den 1 februari 2005 17:57 > Till: Brent Fulgham > Kopia: erlang-questions@REDACTED; erlang-patches@REDACTED > Amne: Re: Documentation Search Path Patches > > > Hi, > > I also just spent some time playing with Darwinports for R10B-2, and concluded that most of these patches are no longer needed - the doc path does not have html in the middle of it. > > The only part I needed was the one for using "open" instead of > "netscape". > > If I can figure out how to submit a patch to darwinports I will. > > Regards, > Sean > > > On 1 Feb 2005, at 08:10, Brent Fulgham wrote: > > > These patches have been reported a few times (and applied in the Debian and DarwinPorts packages of Erlang.) Could they please be applied to upstream OTP so that package maintainers do not have to keep applying the same patches? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Brent From bfulg@REDACTED Wed Feb 2 05:38:50 2005 From: bfulg@REDACTED (Brent Fulgham) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:38:50 -0800 Subject: Mac OS X Patch Message-ID: <423ca97167ee0c9b6aac9ca18635cdd7@pacbell.net> Back in September of 2003, Sean Hinde identified a problem with Erlang under Mac OS X. Could this patch be incorporated upstream so we don't have to keep manually patching the sources? Thanks, -Brent ======================================== From: Sean Hinde Subject: OS X patch for run_erl.c Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:35:17 +0100 Hi, The following patch to run_erl.c is required for Erlang to run in embedded mode under OS X. Without this patch run_erl fails to create the pipe in /tmp Hopefully this will make it into R9C-1, but in the meantime here it is in case anyone else has encountered the problem and needs a fix now. Regs, Sean [HugeMac:~/Desktop] sean% diff -u otp_src_R9C-0.orig/erts/etc/unix/run_erl.c otp_src_R9C-0/erts/etc/unix/run_erl.c --- otp_src_R9C-0.orig/erts/etc/unix/run_erl.c Mon Jul 7 13:01:10 2003 +++ otp_src_R9C-0/erts/etc/unix/run_erl.c Sat Sep 13 18:26:53 2003 -738,7 +738,11 */ static int create_fifo(char *name, int perm) { - if ((mknod(name, S_IFIFO | perm, 0) < 0) && (errno != EEXIST)) +#ifdef HAVE_MACH_O_DYLD_H + if ((mkfifo(name, perm) < 0) && (errno != EEXIST)) +#else + if ((mknod(name, S_IFIFO | perm, 0) < 0) && (errno != EEXIST)) +#endif return -1; return 0; } -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1418 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: