[eeps] EEP 049: Value-Based Error Handling Mechanisms
    Raimo Niskanen 
    raimo+eeps@REDACTED
       
    Fri Dec  7 14:58:36 CET 2018
    
    
  
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 02:08:44PM +0100, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> Are you encouraging the use of non-local returns to work around a limitation of the language?
> 
> Literally all new programming languages made these days have such a short-circuiting construct some way or another that doesn't translate to non-local returns. I don't see what makes Erlang so special that you would argue it doesn't need one.
This has been debated before.  Here is a post from Joe Armstrong in the
middle of a long thread about this:
    http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2014-December/082167.html
> 
> > Le 7 déc. 2018 à 12:28, Kenneth Lundin <kenneth@REDACTED> a écrit :
> > 
> > It is perfectly possible to use throw and try catch to replace or simplify deeply-nested case ... end expressions in the same way as the proposed language extension does
> > 
> >  <>
> _______________________________________________
> eeps mailing list
> eeps@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
-- 
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
    
    
More information about the eeps
mailing list