[eeps] New - EEP 44: Additional preprocessor directives
Tuncer Ayaz
tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED
Wed Oct 14 14:20:43 CEST 2015
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Vlad Dumitrescu <vladdu55@REDACTED> wrote:
> Thank you Björn for your answers.
>
> I think that my worries are mostly related to the following:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Björn Gustavsson <bjorn@REDACTED> wrote:
> >
> > this is not an issue that this EEP is intended to solve
>
>
> Regardless of that the EEP is meant to solve, if developers get
> tools there will be some of them that will use them in ways not
> intended.
>
> Also, even if I don't put any of the new stuff in my code, I don't
> know what the authors of my dependencies do. If the dependency is to
> a source package that I build locally, the issue remains that my
> local environment must match exactly the target.
When using binary packages, we will possibly need multiple builds and
a way to automatically select the right one, but that would only work
for well-known differentiators (-otp18.1, -otp18.2), not some very
project-specific (-otp18.1-with-featureX) compile time check. It's
also important to ensure that all build variations are exercised
properly in the tests, in order to avoid code rot.
More information about the eeps
mailing list