Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote: > Raimo Niskanen skrev: > >> EEP 9 is recognized by the EEP editor(s). >> >> http://www.erlang.org/eeps/ >> > > As a general comment, I'm very much in favour of this. +1. i would prefer a regexp implementation that avoids PCRE. i think Russ Cox argues convincingly that PCRE is a mess. mats