[eeps] Request for comments on EEP-25 "Unnesting cases"
Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
ulf.wiger@REDACTED
Sat Dec 20 15:40:43 CET 2008
Robert Virding skrev:
> 2008/12/19 Ulf Wiger <ulf@REDACTED <mailto:ulf@REDACTED>>
>
> I for one find it acceptable. The "; or case" construct
> is ok -
> perhaps not extremely elegant, but conveys the meaning
> very well.
>
>
> Note that "; or case" is Richard's O'Keefe's way of writing
> it, "normally" it would look like:
>
> case Expr of
> Pat -> Expr ;
> or case Expr of
> Pat -> Expr ;
> Pat -> Expr ;
> or case ...
Yes. I'm aware of Richard's formatting convention, and I would
use it myself if the Emacs mode didn't fight me every step of
the way (or at least every time I hit tab...)
I meant that there are probably more dense ways of expressing
the same thing, but I believe it to be in the spirit of
Erlang to favor intuitive constructs over the saving of a
few keystrokes. (:
BR,
Ulf W
More information about the eeps
mailing list