This EEP proposes enhancing the comprehension syntax to allow emitting multiple
elements in a single iteration of the comprehension loop - effectively enhancing
comprehensions to implement flatmap
with a fixed number of elements.
Comprehensions in Erlang are a very flexible and convinent way of implementing many iteration and looping patterns. However, there are some cases that end up unergonomic, notably, and where the scope of this EEP is, where we’d like to emit multiple elements from a single iteration.
Existing forms of expressing this are awkward and introduce extra, unnecessary allocations. For example:
lists:append([[X + 1, X + 2] || X <- Xs]
[Tmp || X <- Xs, Tmp <- [X + 1, X + 2]]
Both of those ways end up creating an extra allocation of a temporary 2-element list, introducing inefficiency, as well as are, arguably, harder to understand than necessary introducing extra function calls or variables.
This EEP proposes enhancing comprehensions with the ability to do so using a very natural syntax extension of the existing comprehension syntax. In particular for list and map comprehensions:
[X + 1, X + 2, ... || X <- Xs]
#{K + 1 => V + 1, K + 2 => V + 2, ... || K := V <- Map}
The semantics of map comprehensions where multiple keys in the same iteration would end up with the same value, should be the same as if the keys were emitted in subsequent iterations.
Binary comprehensions already support this, and thus there’s no enhancement to their syntax suggested in this EEP, for example:
<< <<(X + 1), (X + 2)>> || <<X>> <= Bin>>.
Today, the comprehension abstract forms are defined as:
E
is a list comprehension [E_0 || Q_1, ..., Q_k]
, where each Q_i
is a
qualifier, then Rep(E) = {lc,ANNO,Rep(E_0),[Rep(Q_1), ..., Rep(Q_k)]}
. For
Rep(Q)
, see below.E
is a map comprehension #{E_0 || Q_1, ..., Q_k}
, where E_0
is an
association K => V
and each Q_i
is a qualifier, then Rep(E) =
{mc,ANNO,Rep(E_0),[Rep(Q_1), ..., Rep(Q_k)]}
. For Rep(E_0)
and Rep(Q)
, see
below.This EEP proposes to change the representation, in a fairly backwards-compatible way
to include the representation of E_0
directly, if there’s just one element emitted,
or a list of elements, if there’s more than one. This slightly complicates the implementation
(vs always emitting a list), but retains backwards-compatibility of the AST for code that
exists today. As such, the definition after the changes would read:
E
is a list comprehension [E_0, ..., E_k || Q_1, ..., Q_k]
, where each Q_i
is a
qualifier, then Rep(E) = {lc,ANNO,Rep(Es),[Rep(Q_1), ..., Rep(Q_k)]}
. Rep(Es) = Rep(E_0)
,
if there’s just one expression or Rep(Es) = [Rep(E_0), ..., Rep(E_k)]
if there’s many. For
Rep(Q)
, see below.E
is a map comprehension #{E_0, ..., E_k || Q_1, ..., Q_k}
, where E_i
is an
association K => V
and each Q_i
is a qualifier, then Rep(E) =
{mc,ANNO,Rep(Es),[Rep(Q_1), ..., Rep(Q_k)]}
. Rep(Es) = Rep(E_0)
,
if there’s just one expression or Rep(Es) = [Rep(E_0), ..., Rep(E_k)]
if there’s many.
For Rep(E_0)
and Rep(Q)
, see below.For example the following expressions:
[X || X <- Xs]
[X, X || X <- Xs]
#{K => V || K := V <- Map}
#{K => V, K => V || K := V <- Map}
Would have the following representations (where _
is substituted for corresponding Anno
values):
{lc,_,{var,_,'X'},[{generate,_,{var,_,'X'},{var,_,'Xs'}}]}
{lc,_,[{var,_,'X'},{var,_,'X'}],[{generate,_,{var,_,'X'},{var,_,'Xs'}}]}
{mc,_,{map_field_assoc,_,{var,_,'K'},{var,_,'V'}},[
{m_generate,_,{map_field_exact,_,{var,_,'K'},{var,_,'V'}},{var,_,'Map'}}}}
]}
{mc,_,[{map_field_assoc,_,{var,_,'K'},{var,_,'V'}},{map_field_assoc,_,{var,_,'K'},{var,_,'V'}}],[
{m_generate,_,{map_field_exact,_,{var,_,'K'},{var,_,'V'}},{var,_,'Map'}}}}
]}
For code that does not use this new feature, nothing changes. For code that uses this new feature parse transforms or any tools using abstract forms, would need to be updated.
This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.