<div dir="auto">I don’t see the point if these « stats ». Nothing have been tried to market a little more this ml with people. While it seems some people are trying to push a forum . </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The sad point of it is that this forum, its coc, its maintenance were never talked inside the community at first and this ml in particular. Not even a topic between *all* ErlEf members. Neither the possibility to keep it as an alternative or way to handle the effort it takes to maintain it has been discussed. And continue to not be discussed. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What about the gouvernance of the forum , how moderator are chosen. Who legally own this forum? Where data are stored? Where and how can be discussed these terms? To who? When will RGPD compliance be present in this site? I think this should be clarified.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Benoît </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 21:53, Fred Hebert <<a href="mailto:mononcqc@ferd.ca">mononcqc@ferd.ca</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">On 12/26, zxq9 wrote:<br>
><br>
>A central point I have to drive into my geopol and intel students over <br>
>and over is that "Capacity drives intent". Even if the original intent <br>
>was to make a more "modern" single place to discuss Erlang, once that <br>
>place becomes The One True Community the exclusionary capacity enabled <br>
>by it will eventually change the intent of those running it. (In the <br>
>end it will only make the Erlang community lore harder to find in the <br>
>noise -- but whatever, no online platform is forever unless you do it <br>
>yourself.)<br>
><br>
<br>
I don't know that there is a "one true community." I now count at least<br>
2 (if not 3) IRC servers and channels, Twitter, the new Erlang forums,<br>
the Erlang section on the Elixir forums, Slack, at least some discord<br>
servers, github discussion groups, the EEF (and its own slack as well),<br>
user groups and conferences, this mailing list (while it is in<br>
function).<br>
<br>
In the past there used to be <a href="http://trapexit.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">trapexit.org</a>, Erlang Central, Basho mailing<br>
lists, etc. Even while the mailing lists were active, erlang-patches and eeps<br>
lists were seeing their content shifted to Github issues and<br>
repositories. <br>
<br>
The Erlang forums were opened with the mailing list is still ongoing,<br>
and even before the announcement that the mailing list would shut down,<br>
it had started accruing activity at a faster rate than here.<br>
<br>
I don't really mind where the community ends up manifesting itself, the<br>
bigger part of it is who is there and what the interactions are (which<br>
is in no small part why I left StackOverflow; not much in terms of real<br>
interactions, the gaming mechanism overtakes all). It would certainly be<br>
disappointing to lose some heavy guns of the community who won't make<br>
the move, and if I could just keep being subscribed in many places, I<br>
would. <br>
<br>
>I'll be on the ML as long as it is around and might occasionally check <br>
>the forums if I'm super bored, but I'm pretty much seeing this as the <br>
>end of the graybeard era -- it will definitely be a case of "nobody <br>
>realized what they had until it was gone".<br>
><br>
>I have absolutely benefited an unfair amount from having this mailing <br>
>list as a resource for the last several years. Thanks to all for the <br>
>lessons and the laughs. Being proven wrong on the ML has always been <br>
>one of those magical experiences where I could directly map blows to <br>
>my ego to immediately useful lessons learned -- really fantastic <br>
>stuff.<br>
<br>
Similarly here. The mailing list and the possibility of talking to<br>
everyone directly has been a huge influence on my career and I've<br>
learned more from this community -- often in these threads -- than in<br>
most other places I have ever been around.<br>
<br>
Unfortunately, the thread we are all discussing in was literally started<br>
because this list started feeling so dead someone was wondering if it<br>
was still working.<br>
<br>
The sad realization is that the mailing lists were already whithering<br>
away, mostly because that's no longer where all discussion would take<br>
place.<br>
<br>
I decided to do a quick check from scraping the archives by gzipped<br>
size to get an idea of how much messaging goes through:<br>
<br>
$ w3m -cols 200 <a href="http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/</a> | \<br>
awk -vFS='[^0-9a-zA-Z]+' '/Gzip/ {print ($12=="KB" ? $11 : $11/1024) "KB", $2, $3}' | \<br>
sort -rn | awk '{print NR "\t" $0}'<br>
1 860KB February 2014<br>
2 680KB May 2011<br>
3 526KB October 2012<br>
4 489KB June 2008<br>
5 468KB March 2012<br>
6 467KB January 2013<br>
7 464KB November 2007<br>
8 459KB August 2006<br>
9 455KB February 2012<br>
10 451KB November 2011<br>
...<br>
68 277KB January 2021<br>
...<br>
166 128KB December 2021<br>
192 100KB May 2021<br>
218 80KB September 2021<br>
221 79KB August 2021<br>
244 57KB April 2021<br>
250 51KB November 2021<br>
253 49KB June 2021<br>
256 48KB February 2021<br>
260 41KB March 2021<br>
263 37KB October 2021<br>
264 37KB July 2021<br>
...<br>
272 25KB June 2000<br>
273 23KB February 1999<br>
274 18KB May 1999<br>
275 17KB July 1999<br>
276 17KB January 1999<br>
277 15KB March 1999<br>
278 0.686523KB January 1997<br>
279 0.548828KB May 1997<br>
<br>
This current month of December is the most discussions we had since<br>
January 2021 (mostly due to the "Pinning operator ^ in patterns"<br>
thread), and most of this year and last year has had activity similar to<br>
the years 1999-2001. Obviously there's no control here for quality vs.<br>
quantity, but it's also obvious the mailing lists aren't what they used<br>
to be either.<br>
<br>
I definitely have personal archives of the Erlang mailing list I'll keep<br>
for a long time, and I hope that the erlang-questions archive remains<br>
publicly available for the foreseeable future, but the mailing list has<br>
long been shutting itself down.<br>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Sent from my Mobile</div>