<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/06/2020 09:32, Kenneth Lundin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOzgw93rgNw_CSMrCQT3VyKas981XKtKp7gHmin8TVikptOkjw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Following up my own post.</div>
<div>We have got a lot of questions and comments regarding this
post and this is an attempt to summarize and answer most of
them.</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>Mikael Petterssons mail was very good an explain most of
the problems with keeping HiPE.<br>
I think the work effort would be even more that 6 man months
just to bring it up on par<br>
with the interpreted version.</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>He Kenneth,</p>
<p>Many thanks for the summary. Just to clarify that my question
wasn't why the team decided to implement JIT instead of fixing
HiPE going forward. I was interested why did you decide to abandon
HiPE 10 years ago and instead put effort into JIT. 6 man months
sounds a lot but from the presentation it looked like a similar
amount of effort was being poured into JIT since as early as 2012,
which coincides with the time when HiPE apparently stopped being
actively supported.</p>
<p>This is not to judge, or criticize, or to play what-if. I am just
curious about the reasoning, if there is any, to learn something
about both technologies.<br>
</p>
<p>Regards<br>
Grzegorz<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>