<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:56.7pt 42.5pt 56.7pt 85.05pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I did this, feels good.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If this is for config, I would say use config_change and regen.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Also code:delete/1 and code:purge/1.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ilya</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;padding:0in"><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:bchesneau@gmail.com">Benoit Chesneau</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, October 25, 2017 03:29 PM<br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">Erlang Questions</a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[erlang-questions] sharing config via a dynamically compiled module?</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">I'm temped to compile dynamically a module for some highly demanded resources<br>
to share their config instead of using ETS for it. But I'm wondering if's not<br>
to hackish. (I'm also tempted by just using something more pure like sharing it<br>
via message passing).<br>
<br>
Are other people do such thing? I can see the following pro/cons:<br>
<br>
pro:<br>
<br>
* fast and constant access, it is just a call to a module function and some literals.<br>
<br>
cons:<br>
<br>
* maybe too much hackish? <br>
* What happen if the resource is deleted when someone is using it? Will the<br>
module be really deleted or will it leaks?<br>
<br>
<br>
What do you think about it? Any feedback is welcome :)<br>
<br>
- benoît<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
erlang-questions mailing list<br>
erlang-questions@erlang.org<br>
<a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions">http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>