<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div class=""></div><div class="">Hi Joe,</div><div class=""><br class="">On 26. Sep 2017, at 16:12, Joe Armstrong <<a href="mailto:erlang@gmail.com" class="">erlang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span class="">My only (I think) problem are the makefiles. I tried reading them</span><br class=""><span class="">and they were pretty complex - I couldn't see where to change the code to</span><br class=""><span class="">make a static image.</span><br class=""></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">You shouldn’t need to touch the Makefiles  key is:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://github.com/erlang/otp/tree/master/xcomp" class="">https://github.com/erlang/otp/tree/master/xcomp</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">You make a copy of one of the files in there and edit that copy.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Together with the description how to cross compile Erlang:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/master/HOWTO/INSTALL-CROSS.md" class="">https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/master/HOWTO/INSTALL-CROSS.md</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Then for the target system set CC CFLAGS LDFLAGS etc in your copy in a way that makes your C compiler link statically.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span class=""></span><span class="">I think If I could make a static version of erlexec, it would become clearer</span><br class=""><span class="">to me.</span><br class=""></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Unfortunately the argument massaging is done in a separate executable and then the proper emulator i.e. erl_main.c is exec() called.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">That makes it also harder for us since we need to duplicate what erlexec does to the environment and the args.  We just leave away erlexec and set the environment variables before calling erl_main() for arguments we keep to the subset that are understood by erl_main() directly without massaging.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span class=""></span><span class="">I wrote the original ring0 etc stuff but have never been deeply in the C and</span><br class=""><span class="">makefiles stuff.</span><br class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""><span class="">Any advice would be welcome.</span><br class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""><span class="">Cheers</span><br class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""><span class="">/Joe</span><br class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""><span class="">On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Peer Stritzinger <<a href="mailto:peer@stritzinger.com" class="">peer@stritzinger.com</a>> wrote:</span><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">For GRiSP we do have a statically linked version of Erlang, what’s the problem of statically linking it?  It just needs the right build system with static libraries.</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">As for the forking OTP to get some specialized version, we have a workaround in GRiSPs tooling.   There is a rebar3 plugin that is able to build a specialized version of OTP from source.  One issue we need to solve: adding our own statically linked drivers</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">and static NIFs to this statically linked beam.  The plugin collects all C drivers etc from all the dependencies and patches them into the OTP source.  Some just get copied over</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">but e.g. one of the <a href="http://Makefile.in" class="">Makefile.in</a> in OTP needs to be patched to add our static drivers to the driver table.</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">We even cross build with this setup and go from nothing to SD card our NAND flash filesystem contents with cross built statically linked beam plus Erlang release.</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">BTW cross building could be a way to build a special Erlang for your hostsystem ... nothing prevents from the cross target to be the same as the host architecture with some build flags tweaked.</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">One caveat remains: there are a few applications in OTP that rely on dynamic linking.  These can be either configured out (currently we still have our patched OTP but we are moving towards getting rid of this requirement) or since there is support for static NIFs in OTP now be made possible static.</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Cheers,</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">— Peer</span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">On 25. Sep 2017, at 22:06, Joe Armstrong <<a href="mailto:erlang@gmail.com" class="">erlang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Everything would be a lot simpler if I could build a static version of erlexec</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">At some level abstraction we have a list of C files that must be compiled</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">and linked together.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">If the C files and the header files were all in one directory this would be</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">easy - as it is the makefiles are generated automatically and the C</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">files that are needed to build the system are all over the place.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">All I need is a makefile to build a static version of erlexec. It is not obvious</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">to me how to do this (otherwise I would have done it :-)</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Cheers</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">/Joe</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Tristan Sloughter <<a href="mailto:t@crashfast.com" class="">t@crashfast.com</a>> wrote:</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">I like the idea of easily built static builds but for dealing with</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">releases being messy (if I'm understanding what you mean) is something</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">that may be solved simply with existing tools like makeself:</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="http://makeself.io/" class="">http://makeself.io/</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">--</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""> Tristan Sloughter</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""> "I am not a crackpot" - Abe Simpson</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""> <a href="mailto:t@crashfast.com" class="">t@crashfast.com</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">On Sun, Sep 24, 2017, at 01:25 AM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">I've customized my OTP build to have a custom Erlang build. The reason</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">I've done this to begin the process of building a fully-self contained</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Erlang program. One of the biggest benefits of the infrastructure in</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Go is that they're fully self-contained statically linked binaries. In</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Erlang, although you can statically link beam itself, unfortunately,</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">the releases themselves are messy, in that you have a lot of files and</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">getting the execution environment right isn't always trivial.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Eventually, the purpose is to build an init system -- something that</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">will be primarily used by sysadmin-types. These need to be statically</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">linked, and often times, the file system isn't fully-functioning when</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">they're starting.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">I've done two things:</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">1) I've modified the set of preloaded files in the VM. It would be</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">really nice if there was a way to do this without forking OTP. I</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">didn't add any existing beam files, but I just changed around some of</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">the file, and code loading code to my need.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">2) I've modified the final, linked product to include custom objects</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">in the final ELF binary.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">This is kind of terrible, as it requires I maintain a fork of OTP.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Does anyone have any recommendations for solving this problem another</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">way?</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">My proposal would be to output a beam.a file with the requisite</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">objects to build a BEAM installation. It would be valuable if I could</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">statically link against this binary, and own main, if it had a</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">separate entrypoint that I could then call into. I've toyed around</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">with this, and for the unix build, it seems possible. Is there any</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">reason why Erlang isn't distributed this way already?</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">If there was a public API for extending the loader, or adding</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">preloaded modules via sections, I imagine that solving (1) would be</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">easy as well.</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">Is anyone open to accepting this upstream if the work is done?</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">erlang-questions mailing list</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org" class="">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions" class="">http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">erlang-questions mailing list</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org" class="">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions" class="">http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class="">erlang-questions mailing list</span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org" class="">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span class=""><a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions" class="">http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a></span><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></body></html>