<html><head></head><body><br> what is the issue in using a tool using the gpl3 license? it's not like you will include in your code.<div><br></div><div>Anyway how does triq compare? does it provides the same level of features. It would be indeed a lot better to provides tests in a form that anyone can launch without having to buy a really expensive license...</div><div><br></div><div>- benoit<br><div class="bloop_sign"></div> <p class="gmail_quote" style="color:#000">On 6 April 2017 at 20:34:58, Krzysztof Jurewicz (<a href="mailto:krzysztof.jurewicz@gmail.com">krzysztof.jurewicz@gmail.com</a>) wrote:</p> <blockquote type="cite" class="gmail_quote"><span><div><div></div><div>Michael Truog writes:
<br>
<br><blockquote type="cite">It would help if you switched to using PropEr instead of QuickCheck, since QuickCheck for Erlang requires a license. Using PropEr instead would be more similar to using QuickCheck in Haskell due to its availability. That should also allow tests like these to be included easily in Erlang/OTP source and reused when testing the Erlang/OTP source code.
<br></blockquote>
<br>Unfortunately, PropEr is licensed under GNU GPL 3.0, which is not compatible with Apache License 2.0. Probably this will not change anytime soon. See this issue for further reference: <a href="https://github.com/manopapad/proper/issues/29">https://github.com/manopapad/proper/issues/29</a>
<br>
<br>triq may be a better solution, as it is licensed under Apache License 2.0. Here is the most active fork: <a href="https://github.com/triqng/triq">https://github.com/triqng/triq</a>
<br>_______________________________________________
<br>erlang-questions mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a>
<br><a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions">http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a>
<br></div></div></span></blockquote>
</div></body></html>