<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Did you happen to evaluate our work on Riak PG?  Riak PG provides a<br>
CRDT based solution for process group membership.  There's a paper<br>
available from Erlang Workshop 2013.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://christophermeiklejohn.com/erlang/2013/06/05/erlang-gproc-failure-semantics.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://christophermeiklejohn.com/erlang/2013/06/05/erlang-gproc-failure-semantics.html</a><br>
<a href="http://christophermeiklejohn.com/erlang/2013/06/03/erlang-pg2-failure-semantics.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://christophermeiklejohn.com/erlang/2013/06/03/erlang-pg2-failure-semantics.html</a><br>
<a href="http://christophermeiklejohn.com/erlang/riak/crdt/2013/06/24/introducing-riak-pg-distributed-process-groups-for-erlang.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://christophermeiklejohn.com/erlang/riak/crdt/2013/06/24/introducing-riak-pg-distributed-process-groups-for-erlang.html</a><br>
<a href="http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2505309" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2505309</a><br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
- Christopher<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi Christopher,</div><div>I did not. I'd be delighted to hear from you if you end up evaluating and comparing them to other existing solutions.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>r.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div>