<div dir="ltr">Any tests I can run locally would be more than welcome.<div><br></div><div>Arch is a great distro to run, I just don't want mistruths being spread.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Loïc Hoguin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:essen@ninenines.eu" target="_blank">essen@ninenines.eu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I know the Makefile doesn't seem to do anything but last I checked (been a while) I had better performance with the precompiled version compared to compiling with kerl (I'm not sure if I tried with manual compilation).<br>
<br>
I'll check again tomorrow.<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 10/31/2013 10:04 PM, Aaron France wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
Demonstrably false.<br>
<br>
ArchLinux uses <a href="https://gist.github.com/AeroNotix/7257133" target="_blank">https://gist.github.com/<u></u>AeroNotix/7257133</a> this to build<br>
it's package, no patches, no wicked switches, just a plain makefile.<br>
<br>
Aaron<br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Olivier Boudeville<br></div><div class="im">
<<a href="mailto:olivier.boudeville@online.fr" target="_blank">olivier.boudeville@online.fr</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:olivier.boudeville@online.fr" target="_blank">olivier.boudeville@<u></u>online.fr</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
I may be wrong but I think that, some time ago, someone (maybe<br></div>
Loďc?) mentioned incidentally in this mailing list that the Arch<div class="im"><br>
Linux version of Erlang (obtained through pacman) was reported to<br>
be, at least in some cases, significantly more efficient than the<br>
stock, official version (the trouble is that I can't find that<br>
message from the list archives).<br>
<br>
I was wondering if it had been confirmed, and, if yes, if there were<br>
some patches sent upstream by the Arch maintainers that could be<br>
fruitfully applied to the official sources?<br>
<br>
Thanks for any information!<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Olivier.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></div>
______________________________<u></u>___________________<br>
erlang-questions mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org" target="_blank">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org" target="_blank">erlang-questions@<u></u>erlang.org</a>><br>
<a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/__listinfo/erlang-questions" target="_blank">http://erlang.org/mailman/__<u></u>listinfo/erlang-questions</a><br>
<<a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions" target="_blank">http://erlang.org/mailman/<u></u>listinfo/erlang-questions</a>><div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
erlang-questions mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org" target="_blank">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a><br>
<a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions" target="_blank">http://erlang.org/mailman/<u></u>listinfo/erlang-questions</a><br>
<br>
</div></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Loďc Hoguin<br>
Erlang Cowboy<br>
Nine Nines<br>
<a href="http://ninenines.eu" target="_blank">http://ninenines.eu</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>