<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-01-24 18:31, Björn-Egil
Dahlberg wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51016FEF.2050302@erlang.org" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-01-24 18:12, Robert Virding
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:892582522.3039391.1359047532333.JavaMail.root@erlang-solutions.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css">p { margin: 0; }</style>
<div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">I think the OTP group made a
bad decision *indexing* binaries from zero instead of one like
the rest of erlang. It is both wrong and makes the system
inconsistent.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Btw, when you say "the OTP group made a bad decision", exactly who
are you referring too? Yourself? Isn't these decisions from
CS-lab? Certainly way before my time =)<br>
</blockquote>
That probably sounds a bit more irritated than intended. <br>
<br>
I'm honestly curious, who decided indexing on terms and binaries and
what was the reasoning behind it?<br>
<br>
I think I recall someone saying that binary-syntax was the last
thing out from CS-Lab?<br>
<br>
// Björn-Egil<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>