<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div>A notation that might serve you reasonably well is FMC</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://fmc-modeling.org/">http://fmc-modeling.org/</a></div><div><br></div><div>It seems to be reasonably aligned with mainstream and have decent traction.</div><div><br></div><div>This paper might work as a a starting point (I have only skimmed it):</div><div><br></div><div>"A System of Patterns for Concurrent Request Processing Servers"</div><div>Bernhard Gröne, Peter Tabeling <br>Hasso-Plattner-Institute for Software Systems Engineering</div><div><a href="http://www.fmc-modeling.org/download/publications/groene_tabeling_2003-server_patterns.pdf">http://www.fmc-modeling.org/download/publications/groene_tabeling_2003-server_patterns.pdf</a></div><div><br></div><div>BR,</div><div>Ulf W</div><br><div><div>On 14 Dec 2012, at 08:51, Max Bourinov wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Hi Erlangers,<div><br></div><div>I am wondering if there is any notation for Erlang processes? I want to use it to describe my systems visually. Something like UML class diagrams but for Erlang (I know that class diagram is not the best example).</div>
<div><br></div><div>p.s.: I heavily use sequence diagrams and they help a lot.</div><div><br clear="all"><div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Max</div><br></div><br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>erlang-questions mailing list<br><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a><br>http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions<br></blockquote></div><br><div apple-content-edited="true">
<div><div>Ulf Wiger, Co-founder & Developer Advocate, Feuerlabs Inc.</div><div><a href="http://feuerlabs.com">http://feuerlabs.com</a></div></div><div><br></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br></body></html>