<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Toby,</div><div><br></div><div>I was going to ask the same thing...</div><div><br></div><div>This is a post by Pieter Hitjens.</div><div>He is the CEO of iMatix, a company that was among the original designers of AMQP and later built 0MQ.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://lists.openamq.org/pipermail/openamq-dev/2010-March/001598.html">http://lists.openamq.org/pipermail/openamq-dev/2010-March/001598.html</a></div><div><br></div>Katerina<div><br><div><div>On Apr 5, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Toby Thain wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 04/04/12 4:44 PM, james wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">A question here, though. As I understand it, AQMP is primarily used in<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">the financial world, or at least particularly favored there. Is this<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">true? And if so, which implementations are particularly popular?<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Well, its hard to say. I've never seen it used, but then I don't work at<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">JPMorgan. RedHat's sponsorship of Apache AMQP should help, but it<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">doesn't seem widely used.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">I did have interest in it (from a 'bet I could write one of those' hobby<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">perspective) but the history seems unfortunate and the very significant<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">changes between the definition between 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 don't bode well<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">IMO. Maybe its a sleeper - its certainly nice to see something specified<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">with a wire format rather than a borken API in a language you don't want<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">to use (for everything). iMatix throwing their toys around and doing<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">zeromq didn't help, though they seem to be having 'issues' with process<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">on that too.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Maybe it will gain some traction once there are multiple 1.0 broker and<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">client implementations and a compatibility festival can be had the same<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">way the IIOP CORBA compatibility was demonstrated.<br></blockquote><br>Pardon me butting in from an uninformed perspective, but isn't 0mq highly regarded in this area?<br><br>--Toby<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">There are more Solace jobs on CWJobs than AMQP (more than zero isn't<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">hard!).<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">erlang-questions mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions">http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><br>_______________________________________________<br>erlang-questions mailing list<br><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">erlang-questions@erlang.org</a><br>http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>