<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div>Reading "OTP-9214 epmd: include host address in local access check"</div><div><br></div><div>I recall that I submitted a patch last year that did something similar to this, but (if I understand right) seems more generic.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-patches/2010-May/001041.html">http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-patches/2010-May/001041.html</a></div><div>"Allow the erlang nodename host part to differ from the hostname"</div><div><br></div><div>It stalled because I didn't submit docs and test cases, which I didn't because there was never any feedback from anyone, nor any replies to my queries about how it might be tested and documented.</div><div><br></div><div>So here goes again: is my patch made redundant by this recent fix? Are they incompatible? Orthogonal? Would it still be interesting to complete the previous patch?</div><div><br></div><div>BR,</div><div>Ulf W</div><br><div><div>On 25 May 2011, at 16:06, Björn-Egil Dahlberg wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Erlang/OTP R14B03 has been released.<br><br>This release is mainly a stabilization of the R14B03 release (but as usual there are some new functionality as well).<br><br>You can find the README file for the release at<br><br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/download/otp_src_R14B03.readme">http://www.erlang.org/download/otp_src_R14B03.readme</a><br></div></blockquote></div>…<div><br><div>
<div>Ulf Wiger, CTO, Erlang Solutions, Ltd.</div><div><a href="http://erlang-solutions.com">http://erlang-solutions.com</a></div><div><br></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br></div></body></html>