Tha pattern was changed to "documentation/doc-X.Y.Z"<br>And also there seems to be at least 1 wrong link<br>in <a href="http://www.erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.5.5/doc/reference_manual/part_frame.html">http://www.erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.5.5/doc/reference_manual/part_frame.html
</a><br><span>"12 Compilation and Code Loading" points to <br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.5.5/doc/reference_manual/code.html#12">http://www.erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.5.5/doc/reference_manual/code.html#12
</a><br><br>but in<br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/part_frame.html">http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/part_frame.html</a><br>it point to man entry -<br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/code.html#12">
http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/code.html#12</a><br><br>Regards,<br>Kirill.<br></span><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Mineiro</b> <<a href="mailto:paul-trapexit@mineiro.com">
paul-trapexit@mineiro.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi.<br><br>I notice that (prominent) search results often point to pages that have
<br>"disappeared", e.g., the #1 search result for "erlang cover module" on Google<br>and the #2 search result for "erlang cover module" on Yahoo are both 404.<br><br>This could be a barrier to adoption. I'm thinking of these conversations
<br>that I have at Yahoo trying to convince people to use Erlang where<br>I have to make statements like "Erlang is not as obscure as Forth".<br>I shudder to think that these people subsequently shuffle off to search
<br>engines only to find error pages when they click links. Yes, they<br>should be going directly to <a href="http://erlang.org">erlang.org</a> for documentation but this is<br>their first view of Erlang and besides people like search engines to
<br>find stuff.<br><br>It looks one pattern are urls with "doc/doc-X.Y.Z" in them going bad when<br>version X.Y.Z gets too out of date. Maybe someone could add something to<br>the doc server to detect this condition and redirect to a later version
<br>of the documentation along with some suitable information message?<br><br>-- p<br>_______________________________________________<br>erlang-questions mailing list<br><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">erlang-questions@erlang.org
</a><br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions">http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a><br></blockquote></div><br>