<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/14/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mats Cronqvist</b> <<a href="mailto:mats.cronqvist@ericsson.com">mats.cronqvist@ericsson.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Kirill Zaborski wrote:<br>> OK, so now meaningful reply from Erlang people.<br><br>  i assume you mean "no" instead of "now".
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>of course</div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">  i'm a bit confused about what you might consider "meaningful". what i tried<br>to express was that from ericsson's perspective, the cost of introducing typing
<br>(huge) is much higher than the perceived benefits (unclear).<br>  imo, the only thing that could change this is compelling evidence that typing<br>would improve ericsson's products.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>so there were no such evidence shown?</div>
<div>And I'm sorry about "no meaningful" it's a bit insulting, but Ulf have given quite a good answer.</div>
<div>And about Prof. Wadler's work - I'll consult him directly</div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">  mats<br>_______________________________________________<br>erlang-questions mailing list<br><a href="mailto:erlang-questions@erlang.org">
erlang-questions@erlang.org</a><br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions">http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a><br></blockquote></div><br>