Election vs consensus
Fri Jan 7 23:14:54 CET 2022
This is not directly related to erlang but for obvious reasons it’s pretty tightly related.
I would like to understand why election algorithms such as bully are afaik deemed not enough to build consistent systems, hence the existence of consensus algorithms such as paxos/raft. More specifically in the creation of simple key/value stores.
I would have imagined that with leader election you can pipe all the read/write operations through the leader, hence implement consistency. However i.e. raft came in to fill this kind of scenario, and I would like to understand why it is needed.
Does someone have pointers on things to read?
Thanks in advance,
More information about the erlang-questions