UBF question
hamishberridge@REDACTED
hamishberridge@REDACTED
Sat Nov 6 16:14:07 CET 2021
Does the role of contract checker act something like validator? If so, does that imply binary_to_term/ term_to_binary does not use that because the communication happens within Erlang environment? I could totally go wrong as I am not familiar with it; but I am curious, because I learned a lot of concepts from Erlang and from reading Joe Armstrong's thesis, even though I never wrote any Erlang code at all. Really appreciate those writings. That helps me a lot in learning system design, and many other parts in programming as well.
Oct 28, 2021, 21:51 by ulf@REDACTED:
>
> The key feature of UBF was that beyond being a serialization format, it was also a contract checker.
> That was a very nice feature. If you'd like to do something like that today, perhaps you'd go for JSON or MessagePack encoding, JSON-Schema and Jesse.
>
> Needless to say, Joe's solution was far more elegant. It was also far less supported, even when he was alive. Joe was always searching for the next interesting challenge, and as memory serves, he parked UBF thinking that he wasn't 100% satisfied with it. It didn't bother him to park something for a decade while trying to address that final wrinkle.
>
> BR,
> Ulf W
> <https://gmail.app.vereign.com/#CiAzy_GB8f6QvveZ4EbTaXoDdsWTb_ETB6W49Cwj1RyD1xIggbHUSgcbmAeIDsfNGcBv5GttvylTY3bzBmlLx8UQ6AA=>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:45 AM <> hamishberridge@REDACTED> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I haven't used Erlang, so I suppose my question is very naive. I read that UBF[1] is not maintained. So I am wondering what's used by Erlang as serialization format? Is there a new one that replaces UBF? Or UBF is still used as it, it's just not much change as it's stable?
>>
>> If there are UBF alternative options, what options are available?
>>
>> Many thanks
>>
>> [1]. >> https://github.com/ubf/ubf
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20211106/f14d1dd8/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: seal-image-2b121f83eea49a7b1f47514a026bd644601f52a0f203394da1d6a9ca74505d2f
Type: image/png
Size: 37239 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20211106/f14d1dd8/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list