Sun Jan 31 18:15:57 CET 2021
one possible solution would be the split in several rebar3 projects:
The application would live in an app, naturally, and a rebar3 lib would
be a good fit for the CRC library.
If you want to "inject" the configuration parameters at compile time,
a .hrl with -define's and maybe -record's would be my first choice. just
use an -include in the CRC library.
If you want to keep the configuration file somewhere external from the
library, you can tell the location
to the library with the rebar3 configuration directive
At runtime/at the user's site, you need to bundle the app and the
correct library. One way to do this would be
to use a release (with rebar3 new release) and put app and lib into that.
I have played a bit with erlang libraries in elixir and nerves (also
elixir), and this is absolutely painfree.
Just adapt the calling syntax to the elixir way:
Erlang/OTP 23 [erts-11.0] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10]
Eshell V11.0 (abort with ^G)
Interactive Elixir (1.11.2) - press Ctrl+C to exit (type h() ENTER for help)
On 31.01.21 14:26, Mark S wrote:
> Hi Dieter,
> A bespoke app for each user is fine, but I want to include the
> configurable CRC library as just a dependency, and not stored or
> versioned with the app. So the configuration parameters would live
> with the app, not the library.
> My naive solution was to put the parameters in a custom text file.
> I'm thinking that creating an include file (.hrl) containing -define()
> macros would be more Erlangish, but still a separate file to
> maintain. Maybe the configuration belongs in the app's rebar.config
> My ideal solution would be something in the app code that gets
> evaluated at compile time, and injects the configuration parameters
> into the library. I didn't mention this before, but I would like this
> library to be easily used with Elixir apps also.
> Good idea about runtime introspection. I had not considered that before.
>> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 12:27:10 +0100
>> From: Dieter Sch?n <dieter@REDACTED>
>> Hi Mark,
>> so instead of each user configures his/her environment, you will have to
>> build a bespoke app for each user.
>> You will have to know the desired configuration for each user, and build
>> a custom version for each variant.
>> The technical part is relatively easy, I think. The parameters can be
>> implemented as -define(ParamX, ValueY).
>> Maybe add some -ifdef, if the configuration is complex.
>> And, from a CM perspective, I would definitely have everything in
>> version-controlled files.
>> No ad-hoc commandline switch-triggered artifacts.
>> Also, for runtime introspection, add a function which outputs the
>> configuration parameters of the module.
>> From my experience, in a commercial environment,
>> you should be most concerned how to be able to reliable and reproducible
>> build a version. And to be able to track which versions are in use
>> kind regards,
>> On 29.01.21 15:25, Mark S wrote:
>>> I'm looking for advice on how to configure code generated at compile
>>> time.? My current solution reads the configuration values from a file,
>>> but the feedback I received indicates that requiring users to create
>>> and maintain a config file, in order to use this library, will at the
>>> very least, severely limit its usefulness.
>>> Is there another way to introduce configuration values at compile
>>> time?? Is there a library you can point me to, that has resolved the
>>> same issue differently?
>>> Specifically, I created code that generates a module, containing a
>>> custom Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) calculation function that
>>> utilizes a CRC look-up table.? Creating the function and the look-up
>>> table requires specifying the bit width, polynomial, initial value,
>>> final XOR value, and whether the input and output values are reflected
>>> or not.
>>> To generate the code module, I used Ulf Wiger's parse_trans library.
>>> In particular, ct_expand:term() to generate the look-up table, and
>>> codegen:gen_module() to generate the code and finally calling
>>> merl:compile() to compile the abstract syntax tree, generated by
>>> Mark Sebald
More information about the erlang-questions