New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Fri Jan 22 11:02:00 CET 2021
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:28:35AM +0900, zxq9 wrote:
> On 2021/01/22 1:43, Tristan Sloughter wrote:
> > I've tried to just say my piece and leave it at that (summary: not a fan
> > but would be nice to have a way to match in fun heads/list
> > comprehensions where variables are shadowed) but have to say that after
> > seeing these examples I'm starting to lean towards agreeing with Richard.
> I'm the opposite, but it probably doesn't matter.
> Someone has an immaculate plan.
I am trying again, in hopefully a more civilized manner...
By constantly repeating that your opinion would not matter and that someone
has a plan to force this feature through you indirectly say:
*) That the decision process for an EEP and the Technical Board at Erlang/OTP
at Ericsson can not be trusted to make a good decision for the Erlang
language and the community.
*) That the community does not want this feature.
This is attacking the decision process itself instead of contributing to
the decision. To me this feels like a way to force your point of view
through in this decision.
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions