Performance of mnesia:select/2
Jacob
jacob01@REDACTED
Fri Feb 26 16:34:56 CET 2021
On 2/26/21 3:53 PM, Dan Gudmundsson wrote:
> Interesting, and times do you get for 500 ets lookup on that data?
Oh, I really should have tested that as well:
timer:tc(fun () -> lists:map(fun(K) -> ets:lookup(t, K) end, Keys) end).
* using lookups: [set, {keypos, 2}]: 3148 us
* using lookup: [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 3423 us
I have repeated the select/pattern runs to have comparable results:
* using pattern, [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 3173 us
* using pattern, [set, {keypos, 2}]: 8091 us
Note that there was quite a high jitter on the measurements so I have
compute the mean value of 3 measurements each.
So lookups and pattern/ordered_set were too close to really come to a
winner here. I had the impression that the variance was slightly higher
with lookup, but digging into this would require a better measurement
setup than what I have been using.
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 3:12 PM Jacob <jacob01@REDACTED
> <mailto:jacob01@REDACTED>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> assuming that the match spec compiler does clever things with
> patterns,
> I'd use select with the following
>
> MatchExpression = [ {{'_', K, '_'}, [], ['$_']} || K <- Keys ]
>
> If did some quick measurements with plain ETS, timer:tc and 500
> keys out
> of 1000000 table entries and got:
>
> * using pattern, [ordered_set]: 4532605 us
> * using pattern, [set] : 4645525 us
> * using pattern, [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 3826 us (!!!)
> * using pattern, [set, {keypos, 2}]: 5714 us (!!!)
>
> * using guards, [ordered_set]: 12542928 us
> * using guards, [set]: 12310452 us
> * using guards, [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 12365477 us
> * using guards, [set, {keypos, 2}]: 12277839 us
>
> I have initialised the DB with [ ets:insert(t, {N, N,
> integer_to_list(N)}) || N <- lists:seq(1, 1000000) ].
>
> I don't know though, how this will translate to Mnesia, but I'd give
> select with pattern on the primary key a try.
>
> /Jacob
>
>
> On 2/26/21 11:03 AM, Vance Shipley wrote:
> > If I need to lookup a list of keys which is the better approach?
> Why?
> >
> > Fselect = fun(Keys) ->
> > MatchHead = {'_', '$1', '$2'},
> > F = fun(Key) ->
> > {'=:=', '$1', Key}
> > end,
> > MatchConditions = [list_to_tuple(['or' | lists:map(F,
> Keys)]),
> > MatchBody = ['$_'],
> > MatchFunction = {MatchHead, MatchConditions, MatchBody},
> > MatchExpression = [MatchFunction],
> > mnesia:select(Table, MatchExpression)
> > end,
> > mnesia:transaction(Fselect, [Keys]).
> >
> > Fread = fun F([Key | T], Acc) ->
> > [R] = mnesia:read(Table, Key),
> > F(T, [R | Acc]);
> > F([], Acc) ->
> > lists:reverse(Acc)
> > end,
> > mnesia:transaction(Fread, [Keys. []]).
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Vance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20210226/2c4268eb/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list