Can't see symbols from Erlang NIF library in core file

Lukas Larsson lukas@REDACTED
Tue Aug 10 14:09:17 CEST 2021


On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 1:31 PM Attila Rajmund Nohl <attila.r.nohl@REDACTED>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> The solution was to start the VM with -debug, so I got a crash at one
> of the asserts and that led me to the bug. The 3rd party library is
> stripped, but I thought that my code should be somewhere in the call
> stack and gdb should show it.... My bug was that I released an other
> resource than I wanted, so there was a "double free", probably leading
> to memory corruption and it might explain that the call stack was so
> bad.
>

Great that you found the bug! Running the debug emulator is always a good
idea to catch errors in NIFs.

Depending on what flags were used to compile the third-party library, gdb
may need the debug information to properly rewind the stack so that you can
see your own frame.


> Lukas Larsson <lukas@REDACTED> ezt írta (időpont: 2021. aug. 10., K,
> 9:07):
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Did you manage to figure out how to get symbols for your nif? There
> should not be anything special that you have to do other than compiling the
> nif with debug symbols. Could it be the 3rd party C library that does not
> have symbols?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 7:38 PM Attila Rajmund Nohl <
> attila.r.nohl@REDACTED> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I'm working on an Erlang wrapper over a 3rd party C library on Ubuntu
> >> Linux on x86, so I'm creating a NIF. Sometimes my code (I think)
> >> crashes, resulting in a core file. Unfortunately the stacktrace is not
> >> really helpful:
> >>
> >> (gdb) bt
> >> #0  0x00007fc22229968a in ?? ()
> >> #1  0x0000000060e816d8 in ?? ()
> >> #2  0x0000000007cd48b0 in ?? ()
> >> #3  0x00007fc228031410 in ?? ()
> >> #4  0x00007fc228040b80 in ?? ()
> >> #5  0x00007fc228040c50 in ?? ()
> >> #6  0x00007fc22223de0b in ?? ()
> >> #7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>
> >> even though I built my NIF .so file with debug info:
> >>
> >> ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
> >> linked, BuildID[sha1]=b70dd1f2450f5c0e9980c8396aaad2e1cd29024c, with
> >> debug_info, not stripped
> >>
> >> The beam binary also has debug info:
> >>
> >> ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
> >> linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> >> BuildID[sha1]=e0a5dba6507b8c2b333faebc89fbc6ea2f7263b9, for GNU/Linux
> >> 3.2.0, with debug_info, not stripped
> >>
> >> However, info sharedlibrary doesn't show neither the NIF nor the 3rd
> party lib:
> >>
> >> (gdb) info sharedlibrary
> >> From                To                  Syms Read   Shared Object
> Library
> >> 0x00007fc28942ed50  0x00007fc289432004  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk3-nocsd.so.0
> >> 0x00007fc289429220  0x00007fc28942a179  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2
> >> 0x00007fc2892e83c0  0x00007fc28938ef18  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6
> >> 0x00007fc2892b76a0  0x00007fc2892c517c  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6
> >> 0x00007fc28928dae0  0x00007fc28929d4d5  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
> >> 0x00007fc2890b9630  0x00007fc28922e20d  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> >> 0x00007fc289657100  0x00007fc289679674  Yes (*)
>  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
> >> 0x00007fc24459c040  0x00007fc2445ab8ad  Yes
> >> /home/nar/otp/23.3.4.2/lib/crypto-4.9.0.2/priv/lib/crypto.so
> >> 0x00007fc2239e3000  0x00007fc223b7c800  Yes (*)
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.1
> >> 0x00007fc2896500e0  0x00007fc28965028c  Yes
> >> /home/nar/otp/23.3.4.2/lib/crypto-4.9.0.2/priv/lib/crypto_callback.so
> >> 0x00007fc289649380  0x00007fc28964bc1c  Yes
> >> /home/nar/otp/23.3.4.2/lib/asn1-5.0.15/priv/lib/asn1rt_nif.so
> >> 0x00007fc289638720  0x00007fc28963bd70  Yes
> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1
> >
> >
> > The asn1rt_nif.so and crypto.so nifs have no special treatment and are
> loaded in exactly the same way as a user-defined nif. So there is most
> likely something different/wrong with how your nif is compiled and/or
> loaded.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I found an answer at stackoverflow
> >> (https://stackoverflow.com/a/32727752/2414208) mentioning that "The
> >> Erlang VM doesn't load NIF libraries with global symbols exposed".
> >> Could this be the reason why I don't see the symbols? Is there a way
> >> to tell gdb to look up symbols from my .so file?
> >
> >
> > I don't think the stackoverflow question is related to your problem as
> it seems to be related to symbols not resolving when doing dlopen and not
> when using gdb.
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20210810/929a3546/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list