error in merl docs?
Sun Jul 26 20:05:22 CEST 2020
> this seems to be only true if the pare_transform module is disabled or if
> the expression is a literal one. in the more general case parse
> transform further expands expression to the merl:qquote/3 and introduces
> the environment into the expression. at least that is my understanding. if
> i'm correct i believe that referencing merl:qquote/3 would be correct as
> well (or more intuitive).
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 6:07 PM Led <ledest@REDACTED> wrote:
>> in the documentation of merl:quote/2 it says "The macro ?Q(Text) expands
>> to merl:quote(?LINE, Text, Env). "
>>> should this reference merl:qquote/3 instead of merl:quote/3 which to my
>>> knowledge does not exist?
>> -define(Q(Text), merl:quote(?LINE, Text)).
I quoted a line from merl.hrl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions