What does scheduler/aux mean in msacc?
Fernando Benavides
elbrujohalcon@REDACTED
Mon Jul 6 16:26:42 CEST 2020
I'll add another data point…
As Lukas suggested, I used *perf* on the running systems and this is what
I've got…
For OTP22:
2.33% 8_scheduler beam.smp [.] process_main
* …the rest of the schedulers running process_main…* 1.57%
6_scheduler beam.smp [.] process_main
0.34% 6_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
xen_hypercall_event_channel_op
0.32% 7_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
xen_hypercall_event_channel_op
0.25% 14_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
0.25% 2_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
0.25% 9_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
xen_hypercall_event_channel_op
0.23% 11_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
xen_hypercall_event_channel_op
0.22% 11_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_shallow_x
0.22% 9_scheduler libc-2.17.so [.] __memcpy_ssse3_back
0.20% 13_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.20% 3_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
xen_hypercall_event_channel_op
0.19% 10_scheduler beam.smp [.] erts_cmp_compound
For OTP21:
2.45% 4_scheduler beam.smp [.] process_main
* …the rest of the schedulers running process_main…* 1.91%
5_scheduler beam.smp [.] process_main
0.45% 15_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.27% 10_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.27% 3_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.27% 7_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.25% 1_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
0.25% 2_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.23% 2_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
0.23% 7_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
0.20% 4_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
0.20% 6_scheduler [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_text_start
0.18% 14_scheduler beam.smp [.] copy_struct_x
I'm not sure what any of those functions are, or why
xen_hypercall_event_channel_op is so much popular in OTP22, tho…
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:42 PM Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED> wrote:
> In a nutshell there is a non-reproducible fluctuation of measurement: one
> subsystem takes 10% instead 8%, another 21% instead 23%.
>
> Totally there seems to be no change.
>
> It is extremely hard to make reliable measurement that helps to find 8% to
> 10% change.
>
--
<https://about.me/elbrujohalcon?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
Brujo Benavides
about.me/elbrujohalcon
<https://about.me/elbrujohalcon?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20200706/87411b48/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list