[erlang-questions] Matching IP address in socket module

[Frank Muller]

Awesome, thanks!

Le ven. 25 oct. 2019 à 12:39, Micael Karlberg <micael.karlberg@REDACTED>
a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> Its early days still, but the goal is definitely that it should
> be faster.
>
> Here is some figures from a (time) test tool which is part of the
> test suite (its basically a ping-pong case), both server and client
> running on the same host (but in different VMs):
>
> Two transports:
>          gen:  gen_tcp
>          sock: socket (tcp)
>
> The socket active mode is a simulation of gen_tcp active mode
> (no active = N).
>
> The tables are the exchange from the client side.
>
> With server side using gen (active = false):
>
>          Transport       Active          Data
>          gen             false           10192 byte/ms, 154 msgs/ms
>          gen             true            10383 byte/ms, 157 msgs/ms
>          gen             once            6003 byte/ms,  90  msgs/ms
>          sock            false           14050 byte/ms, 212 msgs/ms
>          sock            true            14772 byte/ms, 223 msgs/ms
>          sock            once            14050 byte/ms, 210 msgs/ms
>
>
> With server side using gen (active = true):
>
>          Transport       Active          Data
>          gen             false           9447 byte/ms,  143 msgs/ms
>          gen             true            22345 byte/ms, 338 msgs/ms
>          gen             once            5532 byte/ms,  83  msgs/ms
>          sock            false           15316 byte/ms, 232 msgs/ms
>          sock            true            23693 byte/ms, 358 msgs/ms
>          sock            once            22068 byte/ms, 334 msgs/ms
>
>
> With server side using sock (active = false, async = true):
>
>          Transport       Active          Data
>          gen             false           11260 byte/ms, 170 msgs/ms
>          gen             true            22273 byte/ms, 337 msgs/ms
>          gen             once            7703 byte/ms,  116 msgs/ms
>          sock            false           15211 byte/ms, 230 msgs/ms
>          sock            true            24778 byte/ms, 375 msgs/ms
>          sock            once            23086 byte/ms, 349 msgs/ms
>
>
> With server side using sock (active = true, async = true):
>
>          Transport       Active          Data
>          gen             false           11351 byte/ms, 171 msgs/ms
>          gen             true            22469 byte/ms, 340 msgs/ms
>          gen             once            7407 byte/ms,  112 msgs/ms
>          sock            false           15484 byte/ms, 234 msgs/ms
>          sock            true            24885 byte/ms, 377 msgs/ms
>          sock            once            23570 byte/ms, 357 msgs/ms
>
>
> There is of course a bit of overhead since the socket transport
> is trying to emulate (part of) gen_tcp.
>
> This is run on a Dell Precision T1700 running SLES 12 SP2 (not that
> that effects the relative performance).
> Run with a snapshot from the maint branch.
>
> This is obviously not a real use case, but it can be a guideline.
> Also no UDP test (at the moment).
>
> /BMK
>
> On 2019-10-24 18:48, Frank Muller wrote:
> > Hi Thomas
> >
> > Is the socket module faster than gen_tcp/gen_udp in your case? If yes,
> can you please share some
> > numbers.
> >
> > /Frank
> >
> >      > case socket:recvfrom(Sock, 0, nowait) of
> >      >       {ok, {#{family := Domain,
> >      >               port   := Port,
> >      >               addr   := Addr}, Data}} ->
> >      >       .
> >
> >     Hi Micael, Mark,
> >
> >     thanks for your replies. The snippet above helped me getting the
> record
> >     matched.
> >
> >     I'm quite impressed with the socket module, it seems to be pretty
> >     complete, at least for my application.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Thomas
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20191025/825f63e7/attachment.htm>