[erlang-questions] terminate supervisor from it's child process

[Vance Shipley]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:40 PM block.rxckin.beats@REDACTED
<block.rxckin.beats@REDACTED> wrote:
> > No, I meant:
> >     udp_sup
> >          -> udp_worker
> >          -> proto_sup
> >               -> dtls_woker
> >               -> stun_worker
> >               -> srtp_worker
>
> in that case,
> udp_worker can terminate proto_sup
> but who terminate udp_sup ?

No, udp_sup terminates proto_sup. Use a one_for_all strategy on
udp_sup. When udp_worker exits all the others are terminated by the
supervisors.

-- 
     -Vance