[erlang-questions] Force TLS v1.2
WW
kingwang98@REDACTED
Sat Apr 27 22:42:07 CEST 2019
Will it be the only solution that I exported that function even it is not used by outside? Called exported internal function?
Best Regards W.W.(KingWang)
On Saturday, April 27, 2019, 10:15:10 PM GMT+2, WW <kingwang98@REDACTED> wrote:
Thank you for your answer Kostis.
But will erlang crash if any other internal function call this internal function with an argument of integer() or someother term()?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ###=====================================================================###
-spec convert_result_and_exit(any()) -> no_return().
%%%
###=====================================================================###
convert_result_and_exit({error, ErrReason}) when is_binary(ErrReason)->
exit({error, ErrReason}); convert_result_and_exit(no_permission)-> exit(no_permission).
test() -> convert_result_and_exit ( [1,2,3] ). ( It is a use case , why "so they cannot be with any() as argument" ? Where in the erlang doc defined that?)
In this case, test() will crash owing to missing the convert_result_and_exit(_E) -> exit({error, <<"Unknown reason">>}). I do not want it crash, I need a quiet exit (catch it afterwards)instead, will that be possible ?----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is : Why dialyzer could not detect the internal non-exported spec ? Or Erlang module interal function should not have any spec at all , because dialyzer doesn't care?
Is it the limitation of dialyzer or wrong in the design? What is the best solution, in my situation?
BR//Wei Wang
Best Regards W.W.(KingWang)
On Saturday, April 27, 2019, 4:52:29 PM GMT+2, Kostis Sagonas <kostis@REDACTED> wrote:
On 4/27/19 12:43 PM, WW wrote:
> But according to spec the input of the function can be any()! It is
> obvious the _E should be considered, otherwise erlang will crash.
>
> Am I wrong?
Yes, you are.
The function is not exported; all calls to it are from within the module
(i.e., known to dialyzer), so they cannot be with any() as argument;
they can only be with the term types that dialyzer has inferred.
Kostis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20190427/bf595c4c/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list