Sun Apr 14 02:16:48 CEST 2019
That's just the point. I want to use it for specific configuration for
individual nodes and not have to include the code "c:erlangrc" in each
of my programs (set it and forget it configurations stuff).
Having different behavior for "erl" and "escript" is just a stupid idea.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:41 PM bengt <cean.ebengt@REDACTED> wrote:
> If there is no .erlang file it will not be used. That way it is possible to enforce consistency.
> Best Wishes,
> > On 12 Apr 2019, at 01:28, Sam Overdorf <soverdor@REDACTED> wrote:
> > I'm back and still upset with the inconsistent use of the ".erlang" file.
> > It sould be supported by the "erl" program and the "escript" program
> > or not at all. being inconsistent is very bad.
> > You guys need to make up your mind and on one way or the other and not
> > half and half.
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions