[erlang-questions] Erlang 21, Stability and the murder of an innocent Statemachine

[Vlad Dumitrescu]

Maybe "discouraged"?
/Vlad


On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:21 PM Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@REDACTED>
wrote:

> "endangered" vs "deprecated"?
>
> ;-)
>
> --
> Scott Ribe
> scott_ribe@REDACTED
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Oliver Korpilla <oliver.korpilla@REDACTED>
> wrote:
> >
> > "Being phased out by"?
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > On May 4, 2018 9:52:50 AM EDT, Vlad Dumitrescu <vladdu55@REDACTED>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:31 PM Fred Hebert <mononcqc@REDACTED> wrote:
> > The thing that I'm a bit unsure about is that deprecation is used as a
> warning to say something is:
> >
> > a) no longer the favored mechanism to do something
> > b) will eventually be removed.
> >
> > I can tolerate warnings for a) and ignore them, but I don't want to do
> it for b) unless I do not know how long a thing will be deprecated for.
> >
> > Maybe there could be two different warning for the two use cases? I
> confess I can't come up with a good word for the other, though...
> >
> > regards,
> > Vlad
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20180504/3741675b/attachment.htm>