[erlang-questions] Why does Core Erlang have a catch-all clause for everything?
Fri Jan 19 11:45:21 CET 2018
A short discussion about exceptions left us wondering why generated Core
Erlang code always has a catch-all clause for things that don't match?
Is it so it can throw a specific exception? And what would happen if the
catch-all was missing and the input failed to match?
More information about the erlang-questions