[erlang-questions] question re. message delivery

Miles Fidelman <>
Wed Sep 27 17:56:57 CEST 2017

Thanks, Matthias.

That's the kind of analysis that I've been looking for!


On 9/27/17 2:11 AM, Matthias Lang wrote:
> Hi,
> Earlier in this thread, I referred to Hans Svensson's work from 2007.
> I have now found the paper and see that Lars-Åke Fredlund is also an author:
> http://happy-testing.com/hans/papers/EW2007-pitfalls_recipes.pdf
> I like this paper. It has a careful description of what's meant by a
> 'message passing guarantee', it's by far the best I'm aware
> of. Another reason to like it is that it provides a result which was
> surprising to me at the time, i.e. that pid reuse can happen in
> practice (4.1). Still another reason is that it provides the scripts
> needed to reproduce the failure.
> There's at least one more paper on the same subject on that
> page (http://happy-testing.com/hans/).
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list