[erlang-questions] map elements in defined order

[Benoit Chesneau]

to continue the discussion i just commited a simple library that does this:

https://gitlab.com/barrel-db/ehash <https://gitlab.com/barrel-db/ehash> 

Hopefully such thing will be optimised soon :)

- benoit

> On 5 Nov 2017, at 17:44, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 01:16, Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
>> 
>> For term_to_binary/2, of course the result
>> depends on the Options argument, but I take
>> it now that even being explicit about the
>> Options is not enough.  Can we have a
>> 'canonical' option?
>> 
> 
> +1 . That would be an awesome option :)
> 
> - benoit

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20171123/18015e18/attachment.htm>